Call us now:
Why having a thai Partner is critical for establishing a company in Thailand ?
Thailand remains one of Southeast Asia’s most appealing destinations for overseas financiers, providing a strategic location, established infrastructure, and competitive labor expenses. However, foreign businesspeople must navigate a complex legal environment when starting a business in the Kingdom. Central to this framework is the Foreign Business Act of 1999, a key statute that limits the scope of commercial activities that non-nationals may lawfully undertake. The Act operates alongside the Civil and Commercial Code and other sector-specific rules, forming the backbone of corporate and investment law in Thailand. The legal landscape governing foreign investment in Thailand necessitates in most cases engaging a Thai partner to satisfy compulsory ownership quotas and licensing necessities.
This article offers a comprehensive legal explanation of why teaming with a Thai colleague is imperative, the constraints imposed by the Foreign Business Act, the strict prohibition of proxy structures, exemptions under the Foreign Business Permit and Board of Investment, and the legal protections available to foreign shareholders.
Table of Contents
The Foreign Business Act and the 49/51 rule: legal requirement for a Thai partner
The Foreign Business Act categorizes commercial lines into three distinct lists:
List 1: Activities completely barred to aliens like agriculture and land trading;
List 2: Activities linked to national security, culture, and arts requiring Cabinet assent for foreign participation;
List 3: industries where Thais are not yet prepared to contend requiring a Foreign Business License for non-national involvement, including most service industries.
While foreign investment under Lists 2 and 3 is restricted to 49% ownership without approval, a Thai partner is legally necessary for compliance.
The Foreign Business Act defines foreign broadly to include any company over 50% foreign-owned, even those incorporated locally. This threshold mandates the 49/51 structure and compels inclusion of a Thai Partner.
Non-compliance with this provision can lead to criminal penalties, including imprisonment for up to three years and substantial fines, in addition to the forced dissolution of the company. Thus, a Thai partner is not merely advisable but legally indispensable in most non-exempt sectors.
Nominee shareholding structures, an illegal bypass of the Thai partner requirement strictly prohibited by the law
To bypass the foreign ownership restrictions under the FBA, some foreign investors have historically used Thai nominees, individuals who hold shares on behalf of foreigners without real ownership. However, Section 36 of the FBA explicitly prohibits nominee arrangements. A Thai partner must be a genuine investor who contributes capital and exercises shareholder rights independently.
Authorities rigorously examine holdings seemingly without financial means or decision input from local partners. Suspicions of evading ownership limits through nominees prompt investigations, led by regulators like the Department of Business Development and Ministry of Commerce. Strict laws aim to prevent concealed foreign control through nominal Thai ownership on paper only.
If a firm is found to have used nominee shareholders, each the alien and the Thai accomplice confront serious lawful results, counting imprisonment of up to three years, fines varying from THB 100,000 to THB 1,000,000, and revocation of the company’s business enrollment. Accordingly, any Thai accomplice included must be a bona fide co-speculator with demonstrable financial enthusiasm.
Exemptions to the Thai partner necessity: FBL and BOI advancement
Two fundamental lawful instruments permit outsiders to work in restricted areas without a Thai Partner: acquiring a Foreign Business License (FBL) and getting promotion from the Board of Investment (BOI).
The procedure for procuring an FBL from Section 17 of the FBA expects intensive documentation and legitimate justification of the business’ advantages to Thailand, similar to innovation move and nearby work. Endorsement is discretionary and subject to audit by theRemote Business Committee. While accepting an FBL permits 100% outside possession, the procedure is troublesome and endorsement is not ensured.
The BOI may grant investment privileges to ventures in key monetary divisions under the Investment Promotion Act B.E. 2520 (1977). A BOI-advanced organization may be exempt from the confinements of the FBA, permitting 100% outside possession without the need for a Thai Partner. Moreover, the BOI offers motivations, for example, corporate pay assessment exemptions, import obligation reductions, and eased rules for outsider representative work grants. Be that as it may, these exceptions just apply to explicit enterprises and require strict consistency with BOI-forced conditions. Failure to adhere can bring about revocation of advantages, reestablishing the need for a Thai accomplice.
Corporate governance structures to frame relations between investors and Thai partners
While the Foreign Business Act requires Thai majority ownership in defined sectors, foreign companies can enact structures that clarify and formalize the balance of decision-making authority between shareholders. These governance rules are primarily set out in the Articles of Association, the company’s constitutional document, which can be tailored to reflect agreed decision-making mechanisms, voting thresholds, and board composition. To further refine the relationship between the foreign investor and the Thai partner, these provisions are often supplemented by a Shareholders’ Agreement, which establish contractual obligations and routines beyond the provision of the articles of association. Together, these tools draw on corporate statutes securing openness, foreseeability, and synchronized objectives.
- Reserved Matters and Joint Decision Rules
To facilitate joint rule and prevent unilateral actions, owners may stipulate certain vital choices, like amending founding documents, increasing capital funds, taking on debt, or appointing directors necessitate endorsement from Thai partner and external shareholders alike. Reserved topics featured in both constitutional papers and investor contracts foster responsibility and synchronization between the partners. - Share Transfer Conditions and Approvals
The relationship between shareholders can also be governed by transfer restrictions. These may include pre-emptive rights, tag-along or drag-along clauses, or the requirement of board or shareholder approval before a transfer. Such mechanisms are designed to protect all parties and preserve the stability of the shareholding structure, ensuring that any change in ownership respects the initial spirit of the partnership. - Board Composition and Appointment Mechanisms
It is also possible to agree, in the Articles or through a Shareholders’ Agreement, on rules for the appointment of directors. For example, each shareholder group may nominate a proportional number of directors or may require mutual consent for key appointments. This ensures balanced representation at the board level and contributes to good governance practices.
These measures are not intended to circumvent the legal framework, but rather to structure a clear and predictable framework of cooperation between the Thai partner and the foreign investor, in full compliance with Thai corporate law.
Get expert legal guidance.
Legal agreements to frame the relationship between foreign investor and Thai partner: why the shareholder agreement matters
In joint ventures between a foreign investor and a Thai partner, Shareholder Agreement play a pivotal role in defining the legal and commercial framework of the partnership. Beyond the Articles of Association, which provide the general legal structure of the company, the Shareholders’ Agreement offers a tailored and private contract between the parties that reflects their specific expectations, strategic goals, and risk allocation mechanisms.
What is the intent of a shareholder agreement?
The primary function is providing clarity on internal dynamics. It delineates the prerogatives and obligations of every party, establishes processes for consensus building and conflict mediation, and supplies a framework for unforeseen difficulties like paralysis, separation of ways, or fluctuations in involvement.
It proves particularly important when one side (frequently the foreign investor) takes on disproportionate risk by contributing capital or expertise while the other (the Thai partner) offers local networks, authorizations, or operational backing.
Key elements commonly incorporated
A well-drafted shareholder agreement in Thailand routinely incorporates the following provisions:
- Procedures for important determinations: Stipulations defining which decisions necessitate unanimous assent, supermajority approval, or basic majority consent concerning investments, leadership selection, strategic planning, or substantial outlays.
- Profit allocation: Clear rules for how and when dividends are distributed, accounting for any shareholder loans or reinvestment intentions.
- Reserved prerogatives: A list of strategic determinations that cannot be made without express permission from both shareholders, safeguarding the minority entity (often the foreign investor).
- Impasse solutions: Processes to pursue in a deadlock, such as escalating to mediation, third-party arbitration, or buy-sell options.
- Transfer of shares: Clauses regulating pre-emptive rights, rights of first refusal, tag-along and drag-along privileges, and any limitation on transfer to third parties.
- Exit pathways: Predetermined procedures for departure, like put and call options, initial public offerings, or termination of the joint venture.
- Confidentiality and non-compete: Protections against disclosure of sensitive business information and competition by the Thai partner post-departure.
- Each provision must be carefully negotiated to represent the commercial realities and long-term vision of the parties while ensuring conformity with Thai societal values and regulatory constraints.
Our team at Benoit and Partners routinely aids foreign investors in drafting and assessing customized agreements that align with Thai law and safeguard their interests. We help structure secure and balanced partnerships from the onset.
Conclusion
The legal necessity of a Thai partner in Thailand is not solely due to customary practice, rather it stems from the Foreign Business Act’s anchoring requirements. Moreover, Thai law expressly forbids proxy arrangements, further necessitating authentic and transparent partnerships. While certain carve-outs exist, such as through a Foreign Business License or BOI incentives, these come with stringent stipulations and limited applicability.
In light of these contextual realities, foreign investors would be prudent to structure their partnerships deliberatively. Thai law establishes a robust governance framework—including mechanisms like corporate bylaws and contractual instruments—that permits shareholders to unambiguously define roles, responsibilities, and decision-making processes. These tools do not undermine the Thai partner’s position but aim to cultivate a balanced and well-regulated relationship among all involved parties.
By incorporating sound governance principles into the company charter and supplementing it with carefully drafted agreements like shareholder accords or loan contracts, foreign investors and their Thai counterparts can establish a stable and predictable business environment. Such arrangements help preclude misunderstandings, align interests, and ensure long-term cooperation.
Given each case’s uniqueness, engaging qualified Thai legal counsel from the outset remains crucial to fully comply with local regulations, avoid inadvertent proxy risks, and construct a legally sound and sustainable business partnership within the Kingdom.
FAQ
In most service and restricted sectors, yes. Thai law (Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542) requires that foreigners hold no more than 49% of shares unless a specific exemption applies.
No. Nominee shareholding structures are illegal in Thailand and can result in criminal penalties, including imprisonment and company dissolution.
Foreigners may apply for a Foreign Business License (FBL) or receive Board of Investment (BOI) promotion to operate with 100% foreign ownership, under strict conditions.
Through well-drafted Shareholders’ Agreements, reserved matters, voting rules, and governance structures that ensure balance and transparency.
The Articles of Association and a Shareholders’ Agreement are essential. Additional agreements may include loan contracts or director appointment clauses.